Every construction and renovation loan lender has the same goal: originate
construction loans in a safe and cost-effective manner. In order to achieve this
goal and maintain the best interest of the lender as well as the client, lenders
should be willing to have open conversations about contractor acceptance.
A healthy process for contractor acceptance allows the lender to be risk-averse
without leaving money and opportunity on the table.
Contractor acceptance can feel overwhelming and insurmountable, especially for
those who are new or don’t have a process in place yet, but there are a few
simple checks to make contractor acceptance a lot less daunting and a lot more
thorough.
Generally, any lender or financial institution must take inventory of their
current processes and policies regarding contractor vetting. This includes
asking: What does the current risk management policy look like? How does this
process become defined for each individual lender? What does this look like for
a builder?
Each institution will answer those questions differently, but it often comes
down to the size of the institution.
For example, community banks and credit unions may rely on a board of directors
or group of department heads at every level of the loan’s life. This group may
help to curate a contractor acceptance strategy as well as review individual
loan applications along with other more detailed day-to-day work regarding
loans.
However, a larger depository may have the resources to develop a Construction
Division Department and are motivated to find policies and procedures that help
govern contractor acceptance at the national level.
When building policies around contractor acceptance, it is important to consider
how exceptions will work within the process. Not every case is cut and dry, and
certain points may raise a need for an exception.
But regardless of the size of the institution, it’s very important to create a
policy and procedure for contractor acceptance that is well defined and easy to
follow so each member of the team can find repeatable success and avoid common
pitfalls.
To safeguard against contractor acceptance feeling too overwhelming, we have
provided three critical checks to make your acceptance process even easier and
safer.
The three critical checks of the contractor acceptance process:
1. Reference Check
Business and private references are a vital first step to contractor acceptance.
Ask the builder directly for a list of references including past clients and
subcontractors they have worked with. Contact former customers and ask about the
contractor regarding original timelines, if the contractor finished within that
time, if the project was on budget, if they enjoyed working with the builder,
what the outcome was when something didn’t go as anticipated, what type of
project the contractor completed, and if the customer would recommend the
contractor to a friend.Additionally checking supplier and subcontractor
references is hugely helpful to find out if the builder was making payments on
time, if they ever had past-due payments, and what the resolution was. Discover
their credit line and liquidity to ensure they are financially responsible.All
these questions help to determine if the contractor has the experience and the
available credit to support their day-to-day operations.
2. Background Check
Running a background check on the builder’s company is a logical next step in
the process, but running a check on the builder individually is also a smart
move, especially if their business is a self-proprietorship. Check for liens,
bankruptcies, different names for the business, any incorporations or
associations. Are there any potential conflicts of interests? A private
background check on the builder is also important to look for any potentially
problematic behavior. Finding a criminal record and any personal suits can
ensure against a borrower or their family feeling uncomfortable with a builder
working in their home.
3. Financial Check
Ask the builder for tax returns, profit and loss statements, and balance
sheets.With tax returns, it’s important to look for clues and possible red flags
while also allowing the contractor to explain everything in the tax return.
Lenders typically receive two years of tax returns and will highlight any
positive income and any losses or reductions of income from year to year. Common
reasons for income variance may include purchasing new equipment, obtaining a
new building for operations, or perhaps they lost clientele, or owe their
suppliers. It’s the lender’s responsibility to cross reference the documentation
and other references that have been supplied by the contractor.Profit and loss
statements will show the contractor’s sales. Check to see if it matches what
they have already provided in the terms of the number of houses sold, the
average price point, and the cost of goods sold. It is important to see if the
numbers add up logically on this P&L statement. It makes sense for the cost of
goods to increase as the revenue goes up. The opposite isn’t going to make sense
and might be a possible red flag. An extra measure is comparing the profit and
loss statements with the tax returns to see if they align.
With balance sheets, it’s important to look for liquidity. The contractor needs
to have the ability to support their day-to-day operations and fund their
business between draws. Check balance sheets for signs that their lines of
credit are at their maximum capacity with no available funds to pull from. Also,
make sure the builder or contractor answered on their questionnaire what funds
they need when starting a new project to ensure this number is in line with
their liquidity and past balance sheets.
These three things are important elements of due diligence to help lenders
determine the risk level of a builder, and mitigate any potential financial risk
they may pose before accepting them.
Contractor Tracking Best Practices
Keeping track of a contractor’s performance can be paramount to maintaining a
successful business relationship with the contractor and ensuring customer
satisfaction. Say for example a lender has two deals with ABC Builders. Both are
supposed to be finished in six months but took almost 10 months in the end.
Either the contractor or the borrowers are paying interest during construction,
which means in this situation, they have to pay an additional four months worth
of interest, and the lender is losing money while they wait for the project to
finish. This could potentially be a large sum and would definitely leave a bad
taste in the mouth of most parties involved.
For this situation, tracking is important to see if ABC Builders makes a habit
of going over their timelines or budgets. Knowing this tendency, a lender can
take this into consideration when ABC Builders is recommended for future
projects.
If project performance is tracked, lenders can much more readily discuss and
reassess contractors for future work. Tracking also helps lenders determine
their own best practices, such as setting limitations on how many loans one
particular contractor can take on at a time, or deciding a good time to
authorize a full scale build to a contractor who typically specializes in
renovation.
Lenders have the ability to mitigate and determine risk policies for their
builders.
Whether with construction loan management software, a spreadsheet,
or some other option, it’s an important and recommended best practice to keep
track of contractors and their progress on a project, as well as client
relationships as you go.
For more information on contractor acceptance, and to get started on your own
contractor acceptance process, watch this on-demand webinar
now.